Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rules:Harder Extended Tests"
From Jackpoint
(→Sequenced Tests: new section) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — [[User:Jynx|Jynx]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jynx|(Talk)]]</sup> 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST) | I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — [[User:Jynx|Jynx]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jynx|(Talk)]]</sup> 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST) | ||
| − | + | I think if the problem with simply increasing the threshold is that it's not interesting, I'd rather do a sequence of "Linked" extended tests (in the Burning Wheel sense). — [[User:Jynx|Jynx]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jynx|(Talk)]]</sup> 19:48, 6 November 2021 (EST) | |
| − | |||
| − | I think if the problem with simply increasing the threshold is that it's not interesting, I'd rather do a sequence of "Linked" extended tests (in the Burning Wheel sense). | ||
Latest revision as of 19:48, 6 November 2021
Option 1 was my original idea but I think I prefer option 2 or 3 — Revàn(Talk) 10:37, 5 November 2021 (EST)
I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — Jynx(Talk) 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST)
I think if the problem with simply increasing the threshold is that it's not interesting, I'd rather do a sequence of "Linked" extended tests (in the Burning Wheel sense). — Jynx(Talk) 19:48, 6 November 2021 (EST)
