Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rules:Harder Extended Tests"
From Jackpoint
(→Sequenced Tests: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — [[User:Jynx|Jynx]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jynx|(Talk)]]</sup> 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST) | I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — [[User:Jynx|Jynx]]<sup>[[User_talk:Jynx|(Talk)]]</sup> 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sequenced Tests == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think if the problem with simply increasing the threshold is that it's not interesting, I'd rather do a sequence of "Linked" extended tests (in the Burning Wheel sense). | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 6 November 2021
Option 1 was my original idea but I think I prefer option 2 or 3 — Revàn(Talk) 10:37, 5 November 2021 (EST)
I'm not sure why Extended Tests need to be made more difficult? — Jynx(Talk) 19:17, 6 November 2021 (EST)
Sequenced Tests
I think if the problem with simply increasing the threshold is that it's not interesting, I'd rather do a sequence of "Linked" extended tests (in the Burning Wheel sense).
